1. Context: The State of the O.T.O. in the Late 1960s and Early 1970sDuring the late 1960s, the O.T.O. in the United States existed in a fragmented and uncertain state. After the death of Karl Germer, who had been Aleister Crowley’s appointed successor, the organization lacked clear leadership. In this vacuum, multiple figures across the world attempted to lay claim to the Thelemic legacy:
Meanwhile, in California, a small circle of Thelemites, including Grady Louis McMurtry and Phyllis Seckler, regarded the O.T.O. as being in a state of dormancy — a 'Continuum'. Their gatherings at Seckler’s home laid the foundation for what would later become the 'Caliphate' O.T.O. Amid this landscape, a new and controversial Thelemic organization emerged in 1966 in California, The Solar Lodge of the O.T.O. Under the leadership of Jean Brayton, this group claimed continuity with Crowley’s teachings. It was also known under alternative names such as the Velle Transcendental Research Association and the Riverside Lodge of the O.T.O. McMurtry suspected that this Solar Lodge had not only appropriated the O.T.O. name but had also stolen actual books and manuscripts in order to establish an O.T.O. lodge. What began as an ideological rivalry soon escalated into a battle over stolen property, criminal allegations, and legal investigations. 2. McMurtry's Accusations Against the Solar LodgeThe letters McMurtry sent between 1970 and 1973 document his efforts to alert law enforcement officials, the FBI, and the media to the activities of the Solar Lodge. His primary allegations included: (A) The Robbery of Sascha Germer (September 3, 1967)
(B) The Theft of O.T.O. Materials from Other Locations
McMurtry believed that Jean Brayton and her associates were responsible for all of these thefts, which he considered a deliberate attempt to appropriate O.T.O. history and power. 3. The 1971 Negotiation Attempt by Dick BraytonA letter from May 1, 1971, written by Dick Brayton to McMurtry, offers a glimpse into the Solar Lodge’s attempts to negotiate with McMurtry. In this letter, Brayton acknowledged McMurtry’s authority as Caliph and proposed a merger of their factions (see original document). Brayton’s letter reveals several key points:
McMurtry rejected the offer, refusing to align himself with the Solar Lodge due to their criminal reputation and the ongoing FBI investigation. This rejection was a crucial moment in defining McMurtry’s strategy — he chose legal consolidation through copyright claims over numerical expansion through compromise. ![]() 4. McMurtry’s Dual Mission: Supporting the Investigation & Securing O.T.O.'s FutureMcMurtry’s letters reflect two simultaneous goals:
5. Conclusion: What Do These Letters Reveal?The McMurtry correspondence provides a detailed account of the early struggles to reclaim and legitimize the O.T.O. after Karl Germer’s death.
Ultimately, these letters document a pivotal moment in Thelemic history — a period of transition, conflict, and, eventually, the establishment of what would become the modern 'Caliphate' O.T.O. Context![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() O.T.O. Phenomenon navigation page | main page | mail What's New on the O.T.O. Phenomenon site? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |