The so-called 'Caliphate' O.T.O. rests not on unbroken succession but on a reconstituted narrative of continuity. The authority of McMurtry, and by extension Breeze, depends not on the preservation of ritual and constitutional transmission, but on an adaptive, post-facto rationalization of legitimacy through legal incorporation, selective myth-making, and symbolic association with Crowley.
A selection of critical materials illuminating the symbolic, legal, and organisational dynamics within the post-McMurtry 'Caliphate' O.T.O.:
– A foundational debate concerning the so-called instrument of succession: this page provides introductory context, a full transcript of the discussion, and an MP3 audio recording of the original conversation.
– David Scriven’s officially sanctioned and now “revised” History of the O.T.O., which has come to mirror independent archival findings more closely over time.
– An ex-IX° member’s recollections of internal dynamics, disciplinary mechanisms, and cultural atmosphere. See also the full Collection of 36 Re-Collections for comparative testimony.
– Regional case studies: "Ljuben je zakon" or "ljubav pod voljom"? examines the O.T.O.’s presence in post-Yugoslav territories. The Canadian context is discussed in "Moosebump", exploring the 'Caliphate's' northern expansion.
– A legal rupture within the order: James T. Graeb, IX° and co-founder of the 'Caliphate', initiated a lawsuit in 2001 against Breeze, Heidrick, and Jungkurth, among others. The case was dismissed in April 2002.
– An anonymous 2021 exposé, "Burning Down The House", explores intersections between the 'Caliphate' O.T.O., the Argenteum Astrum, James Wasserman, and contemporary right-wing political currents.
– A personal reflection by David King on his brother, Patrick King, self-declared XI° of the 'Caliphate', accompanied by photographic material.
– Cartographic and symbolic mappings of the early decades of the order’s reconstitution are explored in "Maps and Magick: Mapping the 'Caliphate' 1977–1994".
– A wide-ranging collection of facsimiles, documents, letters, and photographs is available here: Pictures + Documents.
– A report on ritual and doctrinal rupture: “The Gnostic Catholic Church Boast”, which outlines how William Breeze forfeited apostolic succession.
  
– Oscar R. Schlag, a self-styled "last grey eminence," occupies a liminal position in the esoteric networks surrounding the postwar O.T.O. milieu. His connections span from Jane Wolfe and Marcelo Ramos Motta to Choronzon Club circles, Karl Germer, and H.J. Metzger.
– Regional variants and contested lineages: a report on One O.T.O. in Brazil offers insight into the complex reception of Thelemic structures in South America.
– Euclydes Lacerda de Almeida reflects on the enigmatic legacy of Marcelo Ramos Motta, a central but polarising figure in the transmission of Thelema in Brazil.
– Marcelo A.C. Santos provides a critical reconstruction in "A Verdadeira História do 'Califado' no Brasil", tracing the emergence and fractures of Thelemic authority in the Brazilian context.
– Michael Staley offers an interpretive essay on ""The Babalon Working", exploring Jack Parsons’ ritual experiment and its occult legacy. This is complemented by an appreciation of Marjorie Cameron, whose artistic and visionary contributions continue to resonate in post-Parsons esotericism.
– Nikolas and Zeena Schreck’s "Demons of the Flesh" presents a broader reflection on sex magick, dualism, and the interface of esoteric praxis and cultural critique.
[From: 'Materialien Zum O.T.O.']
A series of primary source exchanges revealing internal conflicts, rhetorical strategies, and divergent historical claims within the ‘Caliphate’ O.T.O.
|
[AI–generated image]
A triadic e-mail exchange between William Heidrick, Grand Treasurer General of the 'Caliphate' O.T.O., Tyagi Nagasiva (also known as Fr. Nigris), and Peter-R. Koenig explores a range of doctrinal, administrative, and symbolic disputes within the organisation.
The full correspondence includes discussions of:
- Previews of initiations
- Constitutional frameworks and their successive revisions
- The rôle and meaning of the E.G.U.
- The 'Caliphate’s interpretation of the Gnostic Catholic Church (E.G.C.)
- The nature and office of the so-called 'Caliph'
- The contested McMurtry succession claim
- Internal correspondence and its status as institutional memory
- A critical reading of Aleister Crowley’s satirical use of the term Caliph
This exchange (dated August 19 – September 17, 1996) is particularly significant in that it features William Heidrick, who is often regarded as the third-ranking figure in the 'Caliphate' hierarchy, after William Breeze (Hymenaeus Beta) and David Scriven (Frater Sabazius X°). Informally, Heidrick has sometimes been described as the 'Caliphate’s de facto spin doctor' — known for reframing facts in ways that favour Grady McMurtry, Breeze, and the official organisational narrative.
The correspondence articulates a deep-seated tension between mythic continuity and critical historiography; between esoteric authority grounded in lived initiation and the imperatives of documentary transparency; and between sacralized secrecy and the modern demand for institutional accountability — all of which unfold within the contested symbolic economy of the postmodern era.
— Koenig: Where is the proof?
— Nagasiva: I'm unsure of the significance of the question but would like to hear a response.
— Heidrick: I say it, therefore it is so.
[AI–generated image]
An extensive e-mail correspondence between Peter-R. Koenig and David Scriven, Grand Master X° of the North American 'Caliphate', addresses both historical and theoretical questions surrounding the legitimacy and development of the order.
Scriven appears as the priestly steward, guarding a fragile orthodoxy assembled from ritual fragments and legal scaffolding. Koenig takes on the rôle of the heretical questioner, pressing for historical coherence and transparency.
The full correspondence is divided into five parts:
Topics addressed in the exchange include:
- The early O.T.O. and its formative phase under Theodor Reuss
- Arnoldo Krumm-Heller and the Latin American Thelemic tradition
- The contested "election" of 1925 and its aftermath
- The so-called "Emergency" clause and its legal scope
- IX° privileges and interpretations thereof
- Claims to nationhood and sovereignty made by the O.T.O.
- The Church of Thelema and its relation to the E.G.C.
- Aleister Crowley’s episcopal status and its ramifications
- Historical expressions and reconfigurations of the E.G.C.
- The 'Caliphate' as a possible deviation from Crowley’s original intent
- Connections to the Solar Lodge and Freemasonry
- Accessibility and inclusion of disabled members
- The internal politics of secrecy within the organisation
- Archival methodology and the question of documentary control
- Engagements with critical theory and epistemological critique (the "thought argument")
- Heidrick’s narrative authority and rhetorical strategies
- Legal wills, succession disputes, and the legacy of McMurtry’s electoral claims
Notable figures such as Phyllis Seckler, Helen Parsons Smith, and Andrea Bacuzzi appear throughout the correspondence — though mostly as peripheral participants, not as bearers of institutional authority. Whether women could or should have had a say in succession or governance is never mentioned — presumably because no one thought to ask.
This correspondence, spanning from September 1 to November 29, 1996, was initiated in response to Scriven’s publication of an official historical account of the founding of the 'Caliphate'. This narrative diverged significantly from Koenig’s earlier reconstruction, the pointedly titled "Song of the Whitewash". Beneath the surface, the exchange reflects a deeper anxiety over the fragility of institutional memory and the difficulty of maintaining esoteric continuity within a modern bureaucratic structure. Phrases like “I don’t have access,” “that document is lost,” “I’ll try to obtain it” recur throughout the dialogue. Scriven’s admission that key documents are held by different individuals — “Heidrick has that,” “Iannotti controls the archive,” “Lon recalls...” — suggests a fragmented and possibly irretrievable evidentiary core.
William Heidrick’s public stance regarding the publication of this correspondence is encapsulated in the following statement:
"In particular, I will not read or discuss material stolen by Koenig in the case of letters of the US Xth degree, made public in violation of copyright."
Conclusion:
The 'Caliphate' is neither the sole legitimate heir nor an outright usurper, but rather an institutional bricolage — assembled from fragments of charisma, paperwork, and symbolic capital. It exemplifies a paradigm not uncommon in the invention of magical and religious orders. Its myth doesn’t need wheels — only repetition. Stories aren’t lines; they’re loops.
Articles by Jerry Cornelius:
|
